Extending Ghana’s presidential term from four to five years has sparked concerns about accountability, power concentration, and democratic vigilance. Dr. Gbensuglo Alidu Bukari, Head of the Department of Political Science at the University for Development (UDS), warns that this move could entrench executive dominance and undermine governance.
Key Concerns:
– Accountability Deficit: A longer term could lead to reduced parliamentary scrutiny and weakened checks on executive power.
– Power Concentration: Extended terms may embolden incumbents, potentially leading to abuse of power.
– Democratic Vigilance: Frequent elections keep leaders responsive; longer terms might reduce this pressure.
Proponents argue that a five-year term would allow presidents to focus on long-term policies without immediate electoral pressure. However, critics counter that Ghana’s challenges stem from institutional weaknesses, not term length.
